Fake Claude Opus 5 app delivers malware and wipes its own tracks

A malicious GitHub repository impersonated Anthropic and advertised free access to a Claude Opus 5 desktop app, but the download installed RevStealer, a Windows information stealer built to steal credentials, wallet data, browser information, files, and session material.

By Sinisa Markovic September 1, 2026 Approx. 3 min read
Screenshot of a fake Claude Opus 5 malware project
Repository README using Claude Opus 5 branding and a free-access hook. Source image: Morphisec / Help Net Security.
Lure

A GitHub repository named Claude-Opus-5-Free-Desktop impersonated Anthropic.

Payload

The advertised ZIP was about 101 MB and launched RevStealer instead of a real app.

Risk

The malware targeted browsers, password managers, crypto wallets, VPNs, chat apps, game accounts, screenshots, and documents.

Evasion

It used environment checks, encrypted configuration, indirect system calls, C2 fallback, and self-deletion.

Fake Claude Opus 5 App Delivers Malware

Morphisec reported that a malicious GitHub repository impersonated Anthropic and claimed to provide free access to Claude Opus 5. The repository distributed RevStealer, a Windows information stealer focused on passwords, cryptocurrency wallet data, and login credentials.

The campaign relied on social engineering. Victims were directed to GitHub repositories that appeared to host legitimate free software, and the same lure pattern also appeared around game-cheat-themed sites.

The GitHub Lure

The repository was named Claude-Opus-5-Free-Desktop. It offered a file called ClaudeOpus5-desktop.zip, listed at about 101 MB, and supported the deception with screenshots and model comparison charts.

When the file ran, no visible application window opened. The program first checked system memory, processor count, hostname, username, and graphics hardware against blocklist conditions. It then attempted to add the user's AppData directory to Microsoft Defender exclusions, decrypted a bundled file, and launched RevStealer in the background.

What RevStealer Does

The native payload used several stealth choices: resolving Windows APIs without a normal import table, keeping configuration encrypted until use, calling the kernel through indirect system calls, streaming stolen data to its server instead of writing one obvious archive, and deleting itself after execution.

Its command-and-control setup included a fallback path. If the primary server was unavailable, the malware could retrieve another address from a smart contract on the Polygon blockchain, allowing infrastructure changes without rebuilding the malware.

The collection list was broad. It targeted browser databases and saved credentials, browser extension storage, Windows Credential Manager entries, files from around a dozen password managers, files from more than fifty cryptocurrency wallet apps, VPN and remote access credentials, messaging app data, game launcher accounts, OBS streaming profiles, clipboard content, screenshots, and selected user documents.

A victim cited in the report said their Microsoft and EA accounts were compromised shortly after running the download.

Low detection screenshot for RevStealer sample
At the time shown in the report, the malicious file was detected by only one of 66 antivirus engines.

How RevStealer Avoids Analysts

Before collecting data, RevStealer ran ten checks designed to spot virtual machines and sandboxes. These checks covered processes and analysis tools, CPU and memory traits, graphics hardware, system identity, uptime, and related signals. Each result contributed to a hidden score, and once the score passed the threshold, the malware waited briefly and exited.

A separate regional check stopped execution on systems set to Russian, Ukrainian, or several Central Asian languages. Under certain conditions, the malware also displayed a fake verification window with a random challenge code; closing the window or entering the wrong response stopped the run.

RevStealer registered a vectored exception handler around its collection routines so one failed collector would not end the whole theft session. For Chrome and Edge environments using newer App-Bound encryption, it launched the browser under debugger control and placed a hardware breakpoint to capture the App-Bound key when it appeared in memory.

After Collection

Once collection ended, the malware could receive a task list from its server. Confirmed actions included downloading and running a file or executing an operator-supplied command line. Some actions could request elevated Windows permissions and trigger a UAC prompt, but the reporting did not describe a UAC bypass.

Morphisec's conclusion emphasized that attackers can keep changing lures, packaging, hashes, and infrastructure. The report argues that prevention should focus on the execution techniques the attack chain depends on. Morphisec also published indicators of compromise with its full report.

Attack Chain

From fake AI app to self-deleting stealer

A repository impersonating Anthropic uses Claude Opus 5 branding and a free desktop app offer.